Markus Schönhaber wrote: > Mark Thomas: > >> Actually, mod_proxy_http is usually a better choice than mod_proxy_ajp > > Could you please explain a little further? > Since at one site I'm using mod_proxy_ajp I'm interested in what the > advantage of switching to mod_proxy_http might be.
Generally, and YMMV, mod_proxy_http is more stable. This is only a generalisation though. I have used mod_proxy_ajp in the past without any problems. Other reasons include: - you can use https for encryption - it is easier (at least I find it easier) to read http in wireshark than ajp Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
