> From: johnrock [mailto:johnpi...@yahoo.com] > Subject: Re: Apache Portable Runtime ? > > Given that, is it still a preferred idea to install APR?
Your best bet is to measure the performance of your webapp with and without APR. Since you're not using SSL and have limited static content, I suspect you won't see much of a difference. > Is installing the APR considered a 'must do' for anyone > looking to maximize the performance of Tomcat in production? > Or is this something in the category of 'not neccessary/ > adviseable unless you need it'? I'd put it in the latter category, unless you measure a noticeable throughput gain with it. Including APR does reduce portability, since you'll need a different native library for each platform, including just going from a 32- to 64-bit JVM. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
