Thanks a lot Rainer.

If the error messages are in some way "OK", then my question got answered.
Thanks again.

2009/9/30 Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>

> On 30.09.2009 17:19, Bocalinda wrote:
> > Hi André.
> >
> > I actually stopped one server on purpose, to test the mod_jk's behavior.
> > So the errors are not generated due to an overload or something.
> >
> > I would love to send you the whole workers.properties file and
> server.xml,
> > but unfurtunately at this moment I can't.
> > In advance I can tell you that both Tomncat's are running on diffferent
> > servers 10.189.x.x, on port 8009 and 8010 respectively.
> >
> > I stopped the server on port 8009, which coincides with the logs.
> Although,
> > it seems strange to me that it keeps trying to send request to that
> server.
> >
> > Hope this helps...
>
> Yes, if a backend node is gone and you don't inform mod_jk it will
> detect it, but it will also log it.
>
> Currently there is no separate probing of failed backends. If a backend
> has been detected as failed, mod_jk will use one of the requests which
> are eligible for this backend every now and then to see, if it works
> again. Depending on the load this should happen about once a minute.
> Usually mod_jk can detect very quickly, that the backend is still
> broken, log the fact and send the request to some other backend.
>
> If you to a backend out of service for some time, then it is nicer to
> set its attribute "activation" to stopped, Then mod_jk knows, that it
> shouldn't try to send anything there (and will not log any errors).
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to