Henri Yandell wrote: > Not sure where Christopher's email was, but: > > If there is any interest in a retired taglib, I'm all for it being > merged into the Extended Taglib. Currently I plan to consider > replacing the functionality from String Taglib (mostly as EL > functions), Log Taglib and JNDI Taglib (perhaps). > > It sounds like BSF taglib, given it has only the two tags, might be > very interesting if a dependency on BSF itself can be avoided (ie: > base it on javax.script). > +1
If you include just the taglib (the JSR-223 to be created), then its usage would be restricted to Java 6 and up, such that current Java 1.4 and 1.5 installations in the field could not take advantage of it. To cover Java 1.4 and 1.5 BSF 3.0 got created, which implements the javax.script specifications. If BSF 3.0 is included then the scripting support will be available from Java 1.4 on. Starting with Java 6 the Java 6 javax.script would prevail due to using its own package by placement of the classes. ---rony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
