Hi All,

I did get down to 2-3msec response time (was 4-5msec) for requests at the java 
client. I think the profiler indicated 200-300 microseconds out of Tomcat 
instance but still trying to figure out which Tomcat class to look at with the 
profiler and how much the profiler affects the loading of Tomcat.

Bottom line was APR did not get me the rest of the way but doing some OS tuning 
did. So when you get down the 4-5 millisecond level for requests at the client 
improving OS performance for the server via tuning or CPU/memory upgrades would 
get you to sub-millisecond response time at the client. I am using a very old 
non server class CPU/Memory for my "Server" but code/tuning does give big 
dividends.

I did notice via the sniffer (WireShark) that the TCP/IP frame had three 
packets and I really only need 1 or 2 so maybe the 2-3msec response at the 
client could have been 1-2msec or less if I could have adjusted the packets per 
frame somehow (Jumbo frame maybe?).

Best Regards to all,
-Tony
Do'nt try this at home if you like sleep!

--- On Mon, 10/12/09, Tony Anecito <adanec...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Tony Anecito <adanec...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Thanks For All The Help!!
> To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 12:42 PM
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I understand but the tactical goal is improved performance.
> If it does not help it is easy to undo.
> 
> Thanks again,
> -Tony
> 
> --- On Mon, 10/12/09, Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
> > Subject: Re: Thanks For All The Help!!
> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> > Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 12:11 PM
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Tony,
> > 
> > On 10/12/2009 2:01 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> > > Yes you are correct no SSL. I thought I would
> give APR
> > a try since it
> > > was recommended in general to use it for http. As
> you
> > say it could
> > > not hurt.
> > 
> > The only thing it might hurt is simplicity: another
> > component means
> > something else to configure, deploy, keep up-to-date,
> and,
> > potentially,
> > debug if something goes wrong.
> > 
> > Good luck,
> > - -chris
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> > 
> >
> iEYEARECAAYFAkrTcUgACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCDIwCfTj12fwVfXmsoB82bgshEJaUD
> > sKgAoJ8lztV1Pi4ySZyGwFzH5wNzE+zf
> > =EV2D
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > 
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>       
> 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to