Hi,

"Tomcat dies suddenly" thread was exciting almost as "Prison Break" TV series. I couldn't wait to find out what would be solution to the problem, and I must admit that just downgrading to lower sub-sub-sub version JVM left me a bit disappointed. :)

Regards,
Ognjen

Carl wrote:
Taylan,

I have had a similar problem that is yet unsolved (see the thread 'Tomcat dies suddenly'.) In my case, the death left a core file which showed the JVM stopped with a seg fault. A week ago yesterday, we switched to the Sun 1.6.0_7 JVM (from 1.6.0_17 and 1.6.0_17) (Chuck suggested this) and so far, it is running even though we have had loads and usages similar to those that caused crashes in the past.

Therefore, you might consider trying that JVM.

Hope I haven't jinxed myself by saying it is still up.

Thanks,

Carl

----- Original Message ----- From: "Taylan Develioglu" <tdevelio...@ebuddy.com>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: jvm exits without trace


With parent I meant the main JVM process as opposed to forked processes
or threads, sorry to confuse you there. Stracing the threads generates
too much data to store so I had to settle with the parent process.

To answer your other questions.

The code is 100% pure java, why it causes this messy crash is still
unclear but development is working to figure it out.

I'll follow up when we find out more, but I'm not sure if we're likely
to dig into the root cause, working around it is more of a priority
right now than debugging the jvm.


On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 17:08 +0100, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Taylan,

On 3/15/2010 10:19 AM, Taylan Develioglu wrote:
> The cause for the crashes was in our own application code, we're
> currently investigating the exact reason.

Yeah, I'd like to second Chuck's question: was it native code?

> A strace of the parent process shows killed by sigsegv, why or how this
> can happen is still unclear.

So, the parent was being killed? What was the parent of the JVM?

> Thanks to everyone that gave their assistance.

Definitely follow-up to let us all know what you've uncovered... this
was certainly a weird situation.

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkueW4wACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAdhgCfa32vlcsMI5ELCNcLSjjV+S/o
FZEAnjvjXgAwxjejTXexGO//89TyeF+r
=BPtZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to