The objects holding references to the character arrays that ultimately
consume all the memory are of type
org.apache.jasper.runtime.BodyContentImpl as indicated in the object
reference tree below:

There was a bug reported in Tomcat 5.5.9 which says

The problem is that this huge array never gets reset due to the object pooling
implementation in Jasper (JspFactoryImpl maintains a pool of PageContextImpl
objects. Each PageContextImpl object maintains an array of BodyContentImpl
objects), so the memory it consumed is never returned to the heap.

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37793

We do not use the suggest JVM argument in our Tomcat 5.5.27 JVM
-Dorg.apache.jasper.runtime.BodyContentImpl.LIMIT_BUFFER=true

Could adding this argument to the Tomcat JVM resolve the problem?

-Anurag


On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Anurag Kapur <anuragka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Chris and Chuck for your help so far.
> I have added my problem statement with Images to by blog 
> here: http://anuragkapur-techbytes.blogspot.com/2010/10/tomcat-5527-memory-leak-in-escenic-cms.html
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Caldarale, Charles R 
> <chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote
>>
>> > > Attachments are stripped: there is no image to view, here.
>> >
>> > I have attached the heap usage graph as a file this time (heap_usage.jpg)
>>
>> Please read Chris' statement again: attachments are stripped.  If you want 
>> us to look at the pictures, you'll have to post them in some public location 
>> on the web.
>
> Heap utilization is like this:
> http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Oq9OlP-8ap0/TLMAno5Z2lI/AAAAAAAACPA/pUr70osY3HU/s1600/heap_usage.jpg
> An object call reference tree snapshot that I wanted to show you is here:
> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Oq9OlP-8ap0/TLMBRLiUzTI/AAAAAAAACPE/ogO2HI2uYig/s1600/object_reference_tree.jpg
>
>>
>> > Or can the address of the object change in the
>> > lifetime of the tomcat jvm?
>>
>> An object can move on each GC.
>>
> So how should I determine if an object (HashMap entry or character array) 
> that I saw in the first heap dump exists in the next hump dump I obtained 
> after the 4th Full GC?
> Struggling to determine the root cause. Any further pointers would be much 
> appreciated.
> Thanks
> Anurag
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to