I see your point. But most clients will keep the application open for hours, so 
bandwidth saving may be more important than keep-alive.
I think disabling chunked encoding is appropriate for the "long running" 
connections.

Unfortunately, some browsers/ mobile devices have bugs associated with chunked 
encoding, so disabling it is the only way for these to work properly.

> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 17:01:57 +0100
> From: ronald-mailingl...@base.nl
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: RE: How to disable chunked encoding for the Http11NioProtocol 
> connector.
> 
> What is the overhead of ending a tcp connection and creating a new one? 
> Because you are removing the benefits of keep-alive here.
> Compare that with sending 6 extra bytes in a IP-packet that you are sending 
> anyway.
> 
> Ronald.
> 
> 
> Op woensdag, 5 januari 2011 16:29 schreef ilya goberman <gober...@msn.com>:
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Mark, overhead of chunked encoding can be significant. My typical message 
> > is about 50 bytes and chunked encoding takes 6 bytes per message: about 
> > 12%. I use JSON protocol that is already compressed (the way JSON can be 
> > compressed).
> > 
> > Using  "Connection: close" with "Content-Length" header omitted is 
> > perfectly valid from HTTP perspective. The end of response is detected by 
> > terminating connection on the server side. 
> > 
> > In fact some browsers have problems detecting connection termination (and 
> > host of other issues) related to the chunked encoding.
> > While I understand it is not a Tomcat issue, it will score some points for 
> > Tomcat if this is addressed by adding a configuration option.
> > Thanks
> > 
> > > Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 06:14:18 +0000
> > > From: ma...@apache.org
> > > To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: How to disable chunked encoding for the Http11NioProtocol 
> > > connector.
> > > 
> > > On 05/01/2011 05:04, ilya goberman wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I use NIO HTTP Tomcat connector org.apache.coyote.Http11NioProtocol to 
> > > > implement Comet streaming to browsers and mobile devices.
> > > > 
> > > > I would like to disable HTTP response chunked encoding to reduce 
> > > > bandwidth.
> > > 
> > > How significant is the overhead with chunking in your case? I'd expect
> > > it to be pretty small unless only a few bytes are sent at a time (and
> > > even then there is the overhead for the packet).
> > > 
> > > Is there any mileage in using compression to reduce bandwidth instead?
> > > Issues with flushing compressed output streams [1] were fixed last year.
> > > 
> > > > The response will have header "Connection: close" with "Content-Length" 
> > > > header omitted.
> > > > Is there a way to do it besides having client send HTTP 1.0 request 
> > > > (that is not possible in the majority of cases)?
> > > 
> > > Having looked at the relevant source code the only two ways I can see are:
> > > - sending an HTTP 1.0 request
> > > - declaring a content length
> > > 
> > > It used to be possible to control this by disabling keep-alive but that
> > > was changed back in April last year [2],[3] as a result a discussion on
> > > the dev list [4]. If your Tomcat version is old enough, you may still be
> > > able to use the disable keep-alive trick.
> > > 
> > > My own view was then, and is now, that the extra bytes with chunking are
> > > a price worth paying for the client to be able to determine if the
> > > request is complete. That said, an option on the connector to revert to
> > > non-chunked responses when keep-alive is disabled for use cases where
> > > reducing bandwidth is more important than knowing if the response is
> > > complete seems reasonable to me.
> > > 
> > > Mark
> > > 
> > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48738
> > > [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=931709&view=rev
> > > [3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=932913&view=rev
> > > [4] http://markmail.org/message/pim62zhlw4cii7ve
> > > 
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> > > 
> >                       
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
                                          

Reply via email to