Well because I thought that hosting a java server application by Tomcat is just perfect !
You can control a lot of thing, and you can create jsp page for administration purpose. Do you have better than Tomcat for hosting a java server application ? On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:03 PM, André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com> wrote: > Micka wrote: > >> Thx for the advise, My mail will be better for the next time. >> >> To explain better my application, it is a TCP server. And it received >> connection requests from clients. >> >> In my configuration I'm automatically waiting and accepting a connection >> with : >> >> java.net.ServerSocket.accept() >> >> >> After that I give the socket to a Thread to communicate with the device. >> >> >> In my case the device, works with commands. And to check if there is no >> errors during the communication, It send me back an echo. >> Each time that i send a command, I check if the echo is the same, if not, >> I >> create an Exception. >> >> >> is that better ? :p >> >> > Yes, now it is starting to make sense. > The "devices" (which are not browsers), are actually TCP clients, but after > establishing a connection with the server (your application), they become > "passive" and wait for further commands from your Tomcat application. > > :-) > > So now, and purely by curiosity, whhy is your application then hosted under > Tomcat, if it is already its own TCP server and manages its own threads ? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
