On 09/02/2012 23:42, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > > Just to confirm - 7.0.25 seems to solve the problem for the most part.
"Most part"? So there is still a leak? p > /Janne > > On 24 Jan 2012, at 10:53, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > >> >> Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at >> least mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by >> Tomcat, but this is less than what 7.0.23/.22 was doing. I will continue to >> run this a bit further and report back in a day or two whether the situation >> is getting worse. >> >> java 4086 ubuntu 10u sock 0,6 0t0 73725644 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 59u sock 0,6 0t0 77721715 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 96u sock 0,6 0t0 77721057 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 108u sock 0,6 0t0 77723538 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 119u sock 0,6 0t0 77722327 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 132u sock 0,6 0t0 77724248 >> can't identify protocol >> java 4086 ubuntu 134u sock 0,6 0t0 77723129 >> can't identify protocol >> >> >> /Janne >> >> On 21 Jan 2012, at 23:19, Mike Wertheim wrote: >> >>> The change log for Tomcat 7.0.25 contains this entry: >>> "Correct error in fix for 49683. (markt)" >>> >>> Is this bug fix expected to fix the file descriptor leak that was >>> reported in Tomcat 7.0.23? >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
