Romain, if you can post the JIRA number that'd be great.
-David On Mar 2, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm, providers were working in last release. The deployment is different > between both release (so the conf too a bit) but it will not be merged > because too different. > Le 2 mars 2013 10:16, "James Green" <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> David, >> >> Thanks for this. Could someone kindly establish which Jira relates to >> JAX-RS providers not being picked up, this is in 1.6 but am not sure if it >> is a bug fix candidate for 1.5 or a new feature for 1.6. Given it is in the >> official spec I might hope for the former... >> >> James >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 2 Mar 2013, at 05:27, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Based on the feedback we got we've created a 1.5.2 branch based on the >> code from approximately Sat Jan 19. >>> >>> This includes the following JIRAs that were requested: >>> >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-669 >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-668 >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-699 >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-703 >>> >>> This does not yet include this requested JIRA: >>> >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-779 >>> >>> We will definitely add that. >>> >>> For those that are planing to use the 1.5.2 rather than the 1.6.0 with >> the various system rewrites for performance, can you please try the 1.5.2 >> snapshots and report if anything you need ismissing. >>> >>> Builds available here: >>> >>> - http://tomee.apache.org/builds.html >>> >>> If possible, get your feedback in by Friday and we can start rolling >> potential release candidates. >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >>
