never said it was old in a negative way JMS is awesome for REMOTE and ASYNC stuff.
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/3/23 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > just to be sure: @Schedule != @Asynchronous > > > > > True/understood. hahaha! > > My point is this... since i had issues using @Asynchronous, it is hard > going back to @Asynchronous since i'm loving AMQ/JMS. :) > > I think I heard you and/or others say that JMS is old technology (java ee > 5), and I know @Asynchronous is java ee 6, so i trust @asynchronous can do > the job, but i even heard that @asynchronous is not good to use in JSF or > servlet (request-based) apps. >
