maybe just because a not released version moves and yo unever know when you have an issue which code you speak about?
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/3/25 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > I recognize many are interested in a 'release'. I know I am a one-man shop > here, but I definitely find it useful to go with a 'snapshot' version over > a 'release'. > > I really don't understand why so many are stuck on 'releases'. In > open-source world, it is definitely noted that there are many release > versions (x.x.x, etc...). > > this 1.5.2 release that many 'wanted' and/or 'asked for', i still don't > understand why they cannot rely on a good/reliable/stable 'snapshot' > version. I find the snapshot version very 'very' reliable. > > okay okay, it is always a requirement/wish/desire to have a 'stable' > release (instead of a stable 'snapshot'). understood. :) > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Understood and all good. I recognized the same with 1.5.2. I think 1.6.0 > > was created for the same reason. :) > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> As the 1.6.0 is on the way to be released, we created a new version > 1.6.1 > >> for next jiras and patches. > >> > >> JLouis > >> > >> > >> 2013/3/25 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > >> > >> > Interesting, TOMEE JIRA site[1] seems to say that 1.6.1 is on it's > way. > >> :) > >> > > >> > [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis > >> > > > > >
