Basically what i mean is atmo interesting part work side by side with cdi.
The link is a kind of bridge using more or less primefaces and the issue
should be in this part IMO
Le 30 avr. 2013 23:19, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> if I open atmosphere issue, can you follow the issue to help inform
> them/atmosphere what they need to do to become CDI compliant, and so tomee
> can be atmosphere aware?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > interesting... what can/should atmosphere do, so tomee can be atmosphere
> > aware. atmosphere is loaded at startup of tomee. web.xml tells tomee that
> > atmosphere servlet or primefaces push is to be used. i think this is how
> > tomee becomes atmosphere aware. right?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> It works with previous version and tomee is not atmosphere aware so no
> >> link
> >> to tomee
> >> Le 30 avr. 2013 23:02, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <[email protected]>
> a
> >> écrit :
> >>
> >> > can you provide some proof or clarify your statement, so I can report
> >> this
> >> > in atmosphere list of issues? :)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Next tomee is cdi compliant, so the issue would be in atmo
> >> > > Le 30 avr. 2013 22:55, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <
> [email protected]>
> >> a
> >> > > écrit :
> >> > >
> >> > > > I recognize that openwebbeans JARs are different.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > In 2013-04-26 tomee, there are openwebbeans 2013-04-26 JARs
> >> > > >
> >> > > > In 2013-04-29 tomee, there are openwebbeans 2013-04-28 JARs
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
> >> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > interesting. so something changed between 2013-04-26 and
> >> 2013-04-29
> >> > > > > versions of tomee 1.6.0 snapshot?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I can revert to 2013-04-26 version of tomee 1.6.0 snapshot and
> no
> >> > > issues
> >> > > > > if I use latest version of atmosphere 1.0.13 snapshot. :)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> > > > [email protected]
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> Seems it clearly shows that's an atmo issue if it works with a
> >> > > previous
> >> > > > >> atmo version (pby in primefaces since atmo is not cdi friendly
> >> > > normally)
> >> > > > >> Le 30 avr. 2013 21:20, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > > >
> >> > > > a
> >> > > > >> écrit :
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> > I am very very new to github, this is my first time
> publishing
> >> a
> >> > > > project
> >> > > > >> > (or test case) there. URL below.
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > https://github.com/smithh032772/PrimePushCounter
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > I really meant to publish the WAR file. i know you prefer
> >> > pom/maven,
> >> > > > but
> >> > > > >> > this is best i can do for now.
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > You will need the following:
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > PrimeFaces 4.0 JAR[1]
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > Atmosphere 1.0.13 snapshot (latest version) found in snapshot
> >> > > > folders[2]
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > atmosphere-runtime
> >> > > > >> > atmosphere-compat-jbossweb
> >> > > > >> > atmosphere-compat-tomcat
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > [1]
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://repository.primefaces.org/org/primefaces/primefaces/4.0-SNAPSHOT/primefaces-4.0-20130421.152903-4.jar
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > [2]
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/atmosphere/
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
> >> > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >> > > Okay, I have a test case, just trying to upload it to
> github
> >> > > (gotta
> >> > > > >> > > install github for windows).
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > > also, I recognized that this behavior occurs on Full Page
> >> > Refresh;
> >> > > > >> does
> >> > > > >> > > not occur for AJAX/PPR requests.
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <
> >> > > > >> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> > > > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >>> I'd need to look deeper in atmos to check but seems you
> >> just
> >> > > have
> >> > > > a
> >> > > > >> log
> >> > > > >> > >>> issue, no?
> >> > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >> I don't think it is a log issue anymore.
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > >> > >>> That said please just compare 2 steps with a unique
> change
> >> > > > otherwise
> >> > > > >> > >>> that's
> >> > > > >> > >>> impossible to help you
> >> > > > >> > >>>
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >> I think I have done that.
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >> step 1: compared latest tomee 1.6.0 snapshot with a
> previous
> >> > > > version
> >> > > > >> of
> >> > > > >> > >> atmosphere 1.0.13 snapshot (2013-04-15); test result = do
> >> not
> >> > > > >> experience
> >> > > > >> > >> this unwanted logging/behavior
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >> step 2: compared latest tomee 1.6.0 snapshot with latest
> >> > > atmosphere
> >> > > > >> > >> 1.0.13 snapshot (2013-04-26); test result = unwanted
> >> > > > >> logging/behavior,
> >> > > > >> > >> because defaultbroadcaster is instantiated on every user
> >> HTTP
> >> > > > >> request;
> >> > > > >> > >> which reminds me of @RequestScoped bean with constructor
> or
> >> > > > >> > @PostConstruct
> >> > > > >> > >> executing on every (http) request.
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >>
> >> > > > >> > >
> >> > > > >> >
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to