A sample would be great yes Le 1 juin 2013 09:51, "Reinis Vicups" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi, > > I bootstrap from persistence.xml that has entity definition for Permission > and NO entity definition for AbstractBaseEntity (as suggested somewhere on > forums) like this: > > <entity class="my.access.Permission" /> > > So NO, Abstractbaseentity is not listed in persistence unit. I have tried > adding it and got different exception (something with field 'id' does not > have persistence annotations). If this is relevant I can post the exception > I get if adding AbstractBaseEntity to PU. > > > On 01.06.2013 09:22, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> Abstractbaseentity is listed in the persistence unit? >> >> Well you can still enhance it at build time before tests >> Le 31 mai 2013 23:54, "Reinis Vicups" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I get NoSuchMethodError when testing with ApplicationComposer and >>> manually >>> supplied javaagent. When I start container (TomEE) everything works just >>> fine. >>> >>> I enable javaagent for maven test plugin like this: >>> >>> <plugin> >>> <groupId>org.apache.maven.****plugins</groupId> >>> <artifactId>maven-failsafe-****plugin</artifactId> >>> <version>2.14.1</version> >>> <executions> >>> <execution> >>> <goals> >>> <goal>integration-test</goal> >>> <goal>verify</goal> >>> </goals> >>> </execution> >>> </executions> >>> <configuration> >>> <groups>de.orbitx.retena.****IntegrationTest</groups> >>> <includes> >>> <include>**/*.class</include> >>> </includes> >>> <argLine>-javaagent:${project.****build.directory}/openejb-** >>> javaagent-${openejb.version}.****jar</argLine> >>> <workingDirectory>${project.****build.directory}</****workingDirectory> >>> </configuration> >>> </plugin> >>> >>> javaagent is added like this (I use maven-dependency-plugin to copy it to >>> right place): >>> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.apache.openejb</****groupId> >>> <artifactId>openejb-javaagent<****/artifactId> >>> <version>4.6.0-SNAPSHOT</****version> >>> <scope>test</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> The full log I was able to get our of openejb is here : >>> https://gist.github.com/****anonymous/5688204<https://gist.github.com/**anonymous/5688204> >>> <https://**gist.github.com/anonymous/**5688204<https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5688204> >>> > >>> >>> My AbstractBaseClass looks like this: >>> >>> @MappedSuperclass >>> public abstract class AbstractBaseEntity implements Serializable { >>> >>> @Id >>> @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY) >>> @Column(name = "id") >>> private Integer id; >>> >>> // getter setter and so on.... >>> } >>> >>> and the Permission class from stack trace like this: >>> >>> @Entity >>> public class Permission extends AbstractBaseEntity { >>> >>> private String permission; >>> >>> // more irrelevant code is here >>> } >>> >>> I bootstrap from persistence.xml that has entity definition for >>> Permission >>> and NO entity definition for AbstractBaseEntity (as suggested somewhere >>> on >>> forums) like this: >>> >>> <entity class="my.access.Permission" /> >>> >>> I have refactored everything couple of times (removed generics, tried to >>> change AbstractBaseEntity to a concrete class, moved @Id from here to >>> there >>> and now appears that the only option that I have still think of is to >>> remove BaseEntity. >>> >>> Before I do that, I would be happy if someone could help me to avoid >>> that, >>> because this is not solution but, rather, workaround that makes my code >>> worse. >>> >>> thank you guys for your help! >>> reinis >>> >>> >
