interesting, seems as though you are saying that jetty is a dependency (required), and then you said there is no reason to need jetty for it today.
why no reason to need jetty for it today? tomee can/will allow it to work as designed without jetty (after the jetty dependency issue is fixed)? On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi > > it doesn't work since it uses jetty. that said feel free to open an issue > on activemq jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ). There is no > reason to need jetty for it today. > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/7/8 Chris Owens <[email protected]> > > > Anybody have any insight into how to run the ActiveMQ AJAX servlet under > > Tomee? The issue appears to be that the servlet needs Jetty > continuations, > > but that even including the Jetty jars doesn't seem to solve the problem. > > More details here: > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17529464/is-there-a-way-to-use-the-activemq-ajax-servlet-with-tomee > > < > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17529464/is-there-a-way-to-use-the-activemq-ajax-servlet-with-tomee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/AJAX-JMS-Servlet-in-Tomee-tp4664142.html > > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
