tank you for responses .
Il giorno mar, 24/09/2013 alle 07.10 -0700, Mark Struberg [via OpenEJB]
ha scritto:
> In Hibernate
>
> @Basic(fetchType=LAZY)
> byte[] image;
>
> public byte [] getImage() {return image;}
>
> in OpenJPA and eclipselink you will get some 'enhance' classes which
> will do kind of
>
> byte[] image;
> public byte[] getImage() {
> if (!imageLoaded()) {
> image = loadImage();
> }
> return image;
>
> }
>
>
> Means in OpenJPA and EclipseLink, lazy loading does work. In Hibernate
> it does not.
>
> A few years ago I wrote a blog post about it [1]. Maybe this helps.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> [1]
> http://struberg.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/jpa-enhancement-done-right/
>
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: mauro2java2011 <[hidden email]>
> >To: [hidden email]
> >Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2013, 14:49
> >Subject: Re: Hibernate Vs OpenJPA
> >
> >
> >1) so into hibernate bytes [] iti s eager loading??
> >
> >2)But if hibernate not use weaving, whi OpenJPA and Eclipse-link use
> >weaving??
> >
> >3) What then is the advantage of using OpenJPA or Eclipse-link
> instead of
> >hibernate?
> >In my opinion only complicate things ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Hibernate-Vs-OpenJPA-tp4665234p4665251.html
> >Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion below:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Hibernate-Vs-OpenJPA-tp4665234p4665252.html
>
> To unsubscribe from Hibernate Vs OpenJPA, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Hibernate-Vs-OpenJPA-tp4665234p4665260.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
