You said it, you dont handle correctly the lifecycle of your servers ;).
Httpd allows graceful shutdown, that s easier
Le 23 nov. 2013 14:41, "Leonardo K. Shikida" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> The idea is to guarantee that the job is executed. Of course, it may be
> aborted if there´s a problem in the job itself, but if the server is shut
> down during the job execution, this job must be automatically retried on
> the next startup.
>
>
>
> []
>
> Leo
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > It is quite complicated, what's your real goal (not the technical
> > solution)? It looks like timers + @async would be enough
> > Le 23 nov. 2013 14:17, "Leonardo K. Shikida" <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > First of all, I'd like to thank this community for all the help during
> > > these months.
> > >
> > > I've noticed a significant performance/stability improvement from 1.5.2
> > to
> > > 1.6.0. Good job.
> > >
> > > I am experiencing some fine tuning issues, so I'd like to ask you for
> > some
> > > advice.
> > >
> > > My app is simple as that: it's a web app that allows the user to manage
> > > several timers (quartz). Each time the quartz cron job is triggered,
> the
> > > @Timeout method just queues a job (activemq). Then some MDBs consume
> that
> > > job (it's a long running job). So producers can be much faster than
> > > consumers. Both JMS and Quartz are backed by an Oracle XE instance.
> > >
> > > JMS messages are very small and must never be ignored or discarded.
> > >
> > > One thing I've noticed is that I'll have to control the quartz jobs
> > myself,
> > > because even if I pause the timers, when the server is restarted,
> timers
> > > are restored and restarted automatically, probably because the JEE spec
> > > says it must be this way. I am considering the idea of not persisting
> > > quartz, but only some job metadata, and in the next restart, some EJB
> > > annotated with @Start can restart or not each timer.
> > >
> > > Another thing I've noticed is that when I have 10 quartz jobs that
> > trigger
> > > a new job every minute (I was trying every second, but resources were
> > being
> > > quickly consumed, although I'd be happy to find some config that could
> > > allow this in a 8GB RAM machine) would be enough to make my web app not
> > > responsive, hanging forever. That's why I am asking in another email
> how
> > > can I specify different pools for different EJBs. Sounds to me that
> > > something is really not configured well, because 10 jobs submitting a
> JMS
> > > message each second should not be a very big deal I guess.
> > >
> > > Since the bottleneck seems to be in the producer side, I've tried to
> > change
> > > the producer EJB (that has the @Timeout method) from @Stateless to
> > > @Singleton+@Lock(LockType.WRITE) but it seems I've just moved one
> > problem
> > > from one side to another.
> > >
> > > Another thing I've noticed that adding a producerFlowControl="false" to
> > > activemq.xml could help, but it was not enough.
> > >
> > > I've also noticed that consumers work better if I add a
> Thread.sleep(50)
> > > before consuming at onMessage(Message msg), maybe giving some time for
> > JMS
> > > to release locks (I think).
> > >
> > > Last but not least, I've experiencing some strange problems probably
> > > related to the classloader, and I've removed xerces-impl-2.11.0.jar
> from
> > > eclipse factory path (java compiler -> annotation processing -> factory
> > > path, to generate openJPA metamodel classes for Criteria using
> > > openjpa.metamodel=true). I am adding all tomee jars, but I would like
> to
> > > restrict to the barely necessary classes. I am using oracle JVM 7.
> > >
> > > I am not sure if this is also a bottleneck (it seems to be working
> > anyway)
> > > but I am keeping both the EntityManager, TimerService and JMS queue
> > > centralized in a @ApplicationScoped bean, so everytime a EJB needs one
> of
> > > them, they just retrieve from this "global" bean.
> > >
> > > So the idea here is to receive criticisms and suggestions. They will be
> > > very welcome.
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > Leo
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to