Interesting to know that there are separate sync and async pools. I would have assumed that you would configure a pool for stateless session beans that would be used for both sync and async. But i can see that could cause potential thread deadlocks so you need a dedicated async thread pool. But maybe the async pool could use sync pool instances and also have an additional async only pool that can be used in addition to the sync pool only if all sync pool instances are in use? Hope that makes sense to someone.
-- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Re-stateless-bean-pool-all-beans-not-available-async-business-method-causes-problem-tp4667020p4667032.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
