Hi

for jaxrs see conf/conf.d/cxf-rs.properties and add disabled = true.

for bval it should use war impl first but still container API (by spec).

Jersey and spring should work, if not just propose us a sample
reproducing the issue.

PS: using tomee-embedded can be interesting for you and would ease
classpath handling IMO (depend a bit on your app)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-02-04 Miles, Eric (CONT) <[email protected]>:
> I'm really new to OpenEJB and the use of TomEE so please excuse this if it's 
> a dumb question, but I didn't find what I was looking for in the 
> documentation.
>
> We currently use Jetty for embedded integration testing with our Maven build. 
>  Our production deployments are to another, extremely expensive application 
> server so our use of Jetty is limited to only development/integration 
> testing.  We have a need to deploy other JEE artifacts into Jetty (other wars 
> and a few ears containing EJBs) and we have done as much with the inclusion 
> of ActiveMQ and other open source options.  Rather than do all of this, we're 
> looking at leveraging TomEE+ since this all comes baked in.  However, we're 
> having difficulties getting our stuff deployed due to conflicts.  Most of our 
> artifacts are Jersey2+Spring applications, leveraging things such JSR 349 
> with the Hibernate Validator, etc.
>
> My question is, is it possible to turn off TomEE for certain things like it's 
> built in support for JAX-RS or bean validation?  Or is there a way to tell 
> TomEE to use the class/library in a war/ear over what is on the container's 
> class path?  If so, how is this accomplished?
>
> Thanks so much,
> Eric
> ________________________________________________________
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary 
> to Capital One and/or its affiliates. The information transmitted herewith is 
> intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, 
> copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this 
> information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
> in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your 
> computer.

Reply via email to