Hi

stateless means "don"t expect the same instance to be used twice" (if
you store a value and call twice your ejb the second time the value
can be different).

However it is thread safe (pooled) and it allows you to handle
transaction and security as any ejb
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-03-06 17:42 GMT+01:00 Martin Funk <[email protected]>:
> Hi again,
>
> still at a very early stage of conquering the domain of TomEE+.
>
> I have a question on javax.ejb.Stateless. In the specs I read that in the 
> area of SOAP based web services, which are implemented by an EJB component 
> the class implementing the endpoint must be annotated @Stateless or 
> @Singleton.
>
> I got curious on what would happen if the class was annotated @Statless even 
> though the instances were not 'Stateless'
> Exceptions were expected, but non were thrown.
>
> Code Service:
> package de.jaxws.soap.ejb;
>
> import javax.ejb.Stateless;
> import javax.jws.WebService;
>
> @WebService
> @Stateless
> public class SoapEjb {
>
>         private int i;
>
>         public String helloEJB() {
>                 return "helloEJB again :" + i++;
>         }
> }
>
> Code Client (supporting Classes were generated using wsimport):
> package de.jaxws.soap.client;
>
>
> import de.jaxws.soap.client.SoapEjb;
> import de.jaxws.soap.client.SoapEjbService;
>
> public class Client {
>
>         public static void main(String[] args) {
>
>                 SoapEjbService service = new SoapEjbService();
>                 SoapEjb port = service.getPort(SoapEjb.class);
>                 for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
>                         System.out.println(port.helloEJB());
>                 }
>         }
>
> }
>
> Output of Client:
> helloEJB again :0
> helloEJB again :1
> helloEJB again :2
> helloEJB again :3
> helloEJB again :4
> helloEJB again :5
> helloEJB again :6
> helloEJB again :7
> helloEJB again :8
> helloEJB again :9
>
> Could someone please give me a hint on what I'm misunderstanding?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin

Reply via email to