Hi META-INF should be fine for you but WEB-INF is more accurate IMHO. Using arquillian would make it easy but needs some learning you maybe don't want. Copying these file (with mvn?) to target/test-classes (or putting them in src/test/resources/META-INF) is another solution which can be in between both previous ones. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-03-09 13:00 GMT+01:00 hwaastad <[email protected]>: > Hi, > I guess this is discussed several places, but I'm still not 100% sure about > my implementation. > > OK, here it goes: > > I have a war with rest services. > I have implemented bval support for my services defined in ejb-jar.xml. > I have producers for JMS connections and sessions. > > In a war, I guess WEB-INF is the place for adding these files. > However, during tests (openejb-cxf-rs) I need these files in > resources/META-INF or else it won't work. > > So, my question is: drop using WEB-INF and only META-INF (spec says using > web-inf(?)), adding files to META-INF before tests, or use some kind of > alternative-descriptors > > right now I have duplicated ejb-jar.xml/beans.xml; WEB-INF and > WEB-INF/classes/META-INF > > Or is arquillian a better way? > > Any recommendation is valuable :-) > > br, > hw > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/ejb-jar-xml-beans-xml-placement-in-a-war-tp4668144.html > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
