Multiple tomee's on the same machine (with default activemq config) and tomee's 
on different machines produce the error.
It does not matter if the cluster nodes are on the same or on different 
machines.

Von: smithh032772 [via OpenEJB] 
[mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Montag, 24. März 2014 15:40
An: Thomas Schuler
Betreff: Re: Transaction issue for MDB in cluster environment

Is it possible that you are running multiple tomee's on one server/machine,
and using default activemq config?



On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:54 AM, tschuler <[hidden 
email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4668333&i=0>>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we have a TomEE Webprofile 1.6.0 where we have ActiveMQ 5.9 integrated.
> We have a simple application which is deployed as EAR file.
> In this application we have a JMS queue associated with a MDB (Message
> Driven Bean).
> We also have a stateless session bean for sending messages to the JMS
> queue.
>
> When we start the application in a single node it works fine - sent
> messages
> are consumed by the MDB without errors.
> If we start the application in a load balancing cluster with two nodes and
> send multiple messages, we get warnings in the log file and the according
> messages are redelivered.
>
> Mrz 24, 2014 2:09:37 PM org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection
> serviceException
> WARNING: Async error occurred:
> javax.transaction.xa.XAException: Transaction
>
> 'XID:[1197822575,globalId=4000000047544d4944000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,branchId=1000000047544d4944000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000]'
> has not been started.
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransactionBroker.getTransaction(TransactionBroker.java:368)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransactionBroker.acknowledge(TransactionBroker.java:273)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.broker.MutableBrokerFilter.acknowledge(MutableBrokerFilter.java:92)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processMessageAck(TransportConnection.java:476)
>                 at
> org.apache.activemq.command.MessageAck.visit(MessageAck.java:236)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.service(TransportConnection.java:292)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection$1.onCommand(TransportConnection.java:149)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.onCommand(MutexTransport.java:50)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand(WireFormatNegotiator.java:113)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor.onCommand(AbstractInactivityMonitor.java:270)
>                 at
>
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume(TransportSupport.java:83)
>                 at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doRun(TcpTransport.java:214)
>                 at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:196)
>                 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
>
> The JMS Broker is configured in a failover scenario:
>
> <Resource id="MyJmsResourceAdapter" type="ActiveMQResourceAdapter">
>   BrokerXmlConfig
> broker:(tcp://localhost:51516)?persistent=true&amp;useJmx=false
>   ServerUrl =
> failover:(tcp://localhost:51515,tcp://localhost:51516)?randomize=false
>   DataSource myDatabase
> </Resource>
>
> The error occurs only when we start both nodes and after the start we send
> the messages.
>
> We have also adopted the openejb.deploymentId.format setting in
> system.properties to get an unique name for the MDB on each node.
>
> Has someone an idea why this is happening and how we can prevent this
> error?
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Transaction-issue-for-MDB-in-cluster-environment-tp4668327.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Transaction-issue-for-MDB-in-cluster-environment-tp4668327p4668333.html
To unsubscribe from Transaction issue for MDB in cluster environment, click 
here<http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4668327&code=dGhvbWFzLnNjaHVsZXJAb3BlbnRleHQuY29tfDQ2NjgzMjd8LTE4NTIyNTQ0OTI=>.
NAML<http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>




--
View this message in context: 
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Transaction-issue-for-MDB-in-cluster-environment-tp4668327p4668334.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to