well depends what it is. If you use cxf it is, if you don't rely on
proprietary API you don't have to.


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-09-03 14:37 GMT+02:00 hwaastad <[email protected]>:
> OK,
> think I got it.
>
> I'm using a custom binding.xml to convert XMLGregorianCalendar -> Date.
>
> hence, i need cxf-tools-common compile dep.
>
> transitive are cxf-api and cxf-rt-core.
>
> So, to get this working I had to do this:
> <dependency>
>             <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
>             <artifactId>cxf-tools-common</artifactId>
>             <version>2.6.14</version>
>             <exclusions>
>                 <exclusion>
>                     <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
>                     <artifactId>cxf-api</artifactId>
>                 </exclusion>
>                 <exclusion>
>                     <groupId>org.apache.cxf</groupId>
>                     <artifactId>cxf-rt-core</artifactId>
>                 </exclusion>
>             </exclusions>
>         </dependency>
>
>
> On the other hand:
> is there a pro-con on using container provided deps vs deps in app?
>
> I was thinking it was smart to use what comes with tomee.....but I also
> might be wrong :-)
>
> br hw
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/cxf-issue-tp4671552p4671558.html
> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to