And I'd suggest replacing 'tcp' with 'nio' for better performance.
Andy.
On 24/10/2014 22:47, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I don't think so, we want to fail is broker doesn't start in general
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-24 22:37 GMT+02:00 Leonardo K. Shikida <[email protected]>:
is there any property I can set to let tomee start regardless its embedded
jms acquires the lock or not?
[]
Leo
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
wrote:
It is not shocking if second broker is configured as a slave.
Most of the time such config are done with an external amq to keep tomee
stateless
Le 24 oct. 2014 21:37, "Leonardo K. Shikida" <[email protected]> a écrit :
well, I am using BrokerXmlConfig=xbean:file... to get the properties file
but then, here's the problem. While the first tomee starts, the second
one
seems to wait for its embedded JMS to start. Since it will be a slave
server, waiting for a lock, whole tomee also waits for it to start...
so tomee does not start.
is that the expected behavior?
[]
Leo
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Leonardo K. Shikida <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi
I can run 2 tomee's using 2 external JMS servers in the failover mode,
using a tomee.xml like this
<Resource id="MyJmsResourceAdapter"
type="ActiveMQResourceAdapter">
BrokerXmlConfig =
ServerUrl =
failover:(tcp://s1:61616,tcp://s2:61616)?randomize=false
</Resource>
If I want to start two embedded JMS servers, one in each tomee, in a
failover mode, what's the syntax? I've been trying this
<Resource id="MyJmsResourceAdapter"
type="ActiveMQResourceAdapter">
BrokerXmlConfig = broker:(tcp://s1:61616)?persistent=true
ServerUrl =
failover:(tcp://s1:61616,tcp:/s2:61616)?randomize=false
DataSource = MyJmsDataSource
</Resource>
where MyJmsDataSource points to some JDBC resource (must be the same
for
both). Of course, the other tomee declares its broker in the
"BrokerXmlConfig"
But something is not right. I feel I am missing something. Is this the
right syntax?
TIA
Leo
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.com
