2014-11-07 14:18 GMT+00:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>: > @Romain > > We use TomEE for development but still WebSphere for production :) >
I understood and that's exactly why I said it ;) > I will try out my question on TomEE and let you know... thanks anyway for > taking time to answer :) > > /LF > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> 2014-11-07 14:00 GMT+00:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>: >> > Hi! >> > >> >> Hi >> >> >> > I tried to create a CDI Interceptor where the @Interceptor class defines >> > @AroundInvoke and @AroundTimeout methods and then I tried to annotate: >> > >> > 1. The onMessage method of an MDB AND >> > 2. The timeout (@Schedule annotated method) method of an EJB timer >> > >> > The CDI Interceptor is not invoked. >> > >> > If I instead use an EJB Inteceptor it is invoked in both cases above. >> > >> > Questions: >> > >> > 1. I have only tried this in WebSphere so far. Is this out of spec or >> > something that should be bugreported (does it work in TomEE)? >> >> >> Then this is the wrong list ;) >> >> Side note/thought: most of your question are WAS related so I think >> you should think to either $$ more IBM to get better support or just >> move to TomEE. >> >> > 2. My reason for using CDI Interceptors is that I can separate the >> > @InterceptorBinding annotation from the @Interceptor implementation >> class. >> > This way there is only a compile time dependency to the >> @InterceptorBinding >> > annotation. Is there a way to accomplish the same using EJB? >> > >> >> CDI interceptors should work as well, didn't check in TomEE but if not >> that's a bug. >> >> > Regards >> > Lars-Fredrik >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >> > >> > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> > >> > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >> > The information contained in this electronic message and any >> > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >> > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> > immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >> > message and any attachments. >> > > > > -- > Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards > > Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > > STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: > The information contained in this electronic message and any > attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the > address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If > you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg > immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this > message and any attachments.
