Dont think it will serve this purpose out of the box but maybe im wrong Le 28 nov. 2014 08:43, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Don't we have as well the data map for this? > Could work much more easily than the javaagent. > Le 28 nov. 2014 00:25, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a > écrit > : > > > Hi > > > > You want to add a tracker right? An interceptor could help associating > call > > id to the call (generated frm current params for instance) but the best > > solution is a javaagent imo... > > Le 27 nov. 2014 21:39, "Steve Hostettler" <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to have your input on the following problem: > > > > > > I have 2 EARs that communicate through remote EJBs. For business > reason, > > I > > > need to know what is the user language deep down in the stack. I also > > would > > > like to use it transparently that is without changing the methods > > signature > > > (adding the language to all facades). > > > > > > To that end, I use the TransactionSynchronizationRegistry which works > > fine > > > as long as I am not using @Asynchronous calls or @NOT_SUPPORTED > > transaction > > > annotation in the middle of the call. > > > > > > Does the community have a recommendation to solve this problem? > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/How-to-propagate-information-through-remote-EJB-calls-tp4673055.html > > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > >
