After encountering, then prompting and callously disabling TomEE's heartfelt warning against using the Jersey client (see here: http://tomee.apache.org/tip-jersey-client.html), I was wondering why *does* the jersey-core jar include said classes? (This isn't a rhetorical question in case anyone knows) It would more more sense to have jersey-core have a Provided dependency and not mix Spec classes with implementation classes.
It seems like maybe we could maven shade a jar, or ever strip the Spec classes out of the jersey-core jar and let them load off the system classpath. Has this been looked into? I could probably see what I can do if the TomEE devs think it's a worthwhile pursuit. Any insight appreciated :) *Jonathan Fisher* *VP - Information Technology* *Spring Venture Group* -- Email Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmission is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil penalties. If you received this transmission in error, please contact the sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from any computer.
