Not yet in 2.x, we have several things to deal with before (1) we need to finish completely CDI integration even if we are almost done, 2) speak of JPA, 3) JMS: AMQ 5 fork or AMQ6 to be discussed on the list before doing anything cause AMQ 6 != AMQ 5+1
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-28 15:47 GMT+01:00 hwaastad <[email protected]>: > Hi, > "scope", in this particular case, is started by a @Singleton/@Path. > > I'm, playing around with different "fault" scenarios, (asynch threads, AMQ > unavalability) and If I can generate such an issue I get happy. That means I > need to change my strategy :-) > > JMS2......I guess this is already in 2.0.0.SNAPSHOT? > > Thanks again for the dialog :-) > > br hw > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/JMS-Producers-not-strictly-TomEE-tp4673587p4673601.html > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
