little update: with an up to date snapshot (hopefully tomorrow if all is fine or a local build) should support 2.1 descriptor
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-04-06 10:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > Openjpa didnt start 2.1 dev. > Le 5 avr. 2015 23:23, "David Goodenough" < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> Reading the openjpa site, it says that openjpa 2.4 is the version for >> JPA version 2.1. Surely the version in the 5.0 snapshot is:- >> >> openjpa-2.4.0-nonfinal-1598334.jar >> >> which looks like 2.4 to me? Or is something else needed in order >> to have 2.1? >> >> David >> >> On Sunday 05 April 2015 21:58:00 David Goodenough wrote: >> > Oddly when I try to tell Eclipse to use 2.0, it says there is not a 2.0 >> > runtime in the snapshot directory, but it is fine if I ask for a 2.1 >> one. >> > I wonder how it tells the difference? >> > >> > David >> > >> > On Sunday 05 April 2015 22:30:26 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> > > Yes or not rely on tomee to manage your persistence >> > > Le 5 avr. 2015 22:19, "David Goodenough" >> > > <[email protected]>> >> > > a écrit : >> > > > So I need to configure to use 2.0? >> > > > >> > > > David >> > > > >> > > > On Sunday 05 April 2015 20:51:05 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> > > > > *2.1 >> > > > > >> > > > > Le 5 avr. 2015 20:50, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> >> a >> > > > >> > > > écrit : >> > > > > > Tomee 2 doesnt support jpa 2 yet >> > > > > > Le 5 avr. 2015 20:43, "David Goodenough" < >> > > > > > >> > > > > > [email protected]> a écrit : >> > > > > >> Eclipse seems to set up persistence.xml with:- >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/persistence"; >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> while Tomee2.0 snapshot seems to want:- >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"; >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> I have Eclipse Luna installed and as up to date as is >> available, >> > > > > >> and >> > > > >> > > > JPA >> > > > >> > > > > >> is set to use JPA 2.1 which seems to be the latest generic >> version >> > > > > >> it >> > > > > >> knows >> > > > > >> about, the alternative being EclipseLink 2.5. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> I take it that I have configured Eclipse wrongly somewhere, >> anyone >> > > > > >> got >> > > > > >> any idea where? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> David >> >>
