Thank you, I think the only thing you missed was listing JAX-RS in 
the list of components in the Web Profile version.

BTW, when was the name changed from 2.0.0 to 7.0.0.  Would I be right to 
presume that the 7.0.0 is meant to follow the version of Java-EE it 
implements?

David

On Tuesday 19 May 2015 17:16:39 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> good catch, done + added
> http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-7.0.0-snapshot.html
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>
> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> 
> 2015-05-19 16:59 GMT+02:00 David Goodenough <
> 
> [email protected]>:
> > OK, perhaps it should be removed from the 2.0 snapshots page:-
> > 
> > http://tomee.apache.org/download/tomee-2.0.0-snapshot.html
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > On Tuesday 19 May 2015 15:57:27 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > this versions doesnt exist anymore since it is the web profile in tomee
> > > 7
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > 
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau>
> > 
> > > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > 
> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > > 
> > > 2015-05-19 15:41 GMT+02:00 David Goodenough <
> > > 
> > > [email protected]>:
> > > > I notice that if I go to the 2.0 snapshot download page and
> > > > select the Plus version I get a TAR or ZIP, but if I look for the
> > > > Jax-RS version I get:-
> > > > 
> > > > 404 - Not Found
> > > > Path /org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/apache-
> > > > tomee-2.0.0-20150513.041200-285-jaxrs.tar.gz not found in local
> > 
> > storage of
> > 
> > > > repository "Snapshots" [id=snapshots]
> > > > 
> > > > The same happens for the ZIP version.
> > > > 
> > > > The Web profile version also works, it is just the Jax-rs version
> > > > which seems to have a problem.
> > > > 
> > > > David

Reply via email to