use keepServerXmlAsthis I think during build phase

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-08-10 10:19 GMT-07:00 Yann Blazart <[email protected]>:

> it does'nt work.  it's before.  i can't provide server.xml with vars.
> tomee:exec fail.
> Le 10 août 2015 19:11, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi Yann,
> >
> > you should be able to use "-DadditionalSystemProperties=-Dhttp.port=1080
> > -Dhttps.port=1443"
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-08-10 10:08 GMT-07:00 Yann Blazart <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Hello, currently I'm trying to make packing to deliver TomEE and Apps
> in
> > > production as One Jar to run with tomee:exec.
> > > The only way I found to permit to the production team to configure
> > > resources is to make them write a tomee.xml and provide its path by
> using
> > > the -DadditionalSystemProperties=-Dopenejb.conf.file=...
> > >
> > > Well done, but to configure the http listening port, I followed a blog
> > post
> > > from Romain.
> > >
> > > in the blog article 50 shades of tomee, Romain has written that we
> could
> > > use tomee:exec to generate the big jar and pass some vars to the next
> > java
> > > command, to launch tomee, to override some values. In his example he
> say
> > > that he can override the http.port in server.xml. Great !
> > >
> > > But in fact, while I'm providing a server.xml with the ${http.port} in
> > the
> > > connector for the tomcat, the tomee:exec fail because of an
> > > NumberFormatException.
> > >
> > > The plugin tomee try to get the value from  the provided server.xml,
> with
> > > pain of course in this case.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to fix it ? I can't clearly see the impacts on the other
> > > goals of the mojo if I change the code.
> > >
> > > Does anybody have an idea ?
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to