ObjectCache is not jcache, it is a tomitribe extension.

Side note: api is here already, no need to add it in tomee plus.
Le 17 août 2015 08:09, "Steve Goldsmith" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> @ObjectCache not found after adding (see
>
> http://www.tomitribe.com/blog/2015/07/apache-tomee-arquillian-jcache-cdi-and-hazelcast-what-more-could-you-want
> ):
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>javax.cache</groupId>
>             <artifactId>cache-api</artifactId>
>             <version>1.0.0</version>
>         </dependency>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>com.hazelcast</groupId>
>             <artifactId>hazelcast-all</artifactId>
>             <version>3.5.1</version>
>         </dependency>
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > yes but IIRC you can also provider your own in your app - exactly like
> JPA.
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-08-17 7:17 GMT-07:00 Steve Goldsmith <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > No, I just want to use an EE solution instead of EHCache. Do you use
> > Apache
> > > JCS?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Yes - are you looking for sometjing in particular?
> > > > Le 17 août 2015 07:12, "sgjava" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > Is JSR-107, JCache currently part of TomEE 7.0.0 SNAPSHOT? If so,
> is
> > it
> > > > > stable?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > >
> > >
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/JSR-107-JCache-tp4675910.html
> > > > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steven P. Goldsmith
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Steven P. Goldsmith
>

Reply via email to