I understand the need to wrap the result in a AsyncResult

My question is if inside the @Asynchronous method I have a Thread.sleep()
and if the caller method keeps the Future object, if I call
Future.cancel(true), will it send an interrupt to the @Asynchrnonous method
or will it be ignored?

[]

Leo

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
wrote:

> the future returned to the caller can be cancelled, the future instance you
> return can't since it is here just to match the returned type:
>
> public Future<Foo> asyncMethod() {
>     return new Foo();
> }
>
> this is really what you do but it doesnt compile so you wrap Foo in an
> AsyncResult to match java typing but if you debug it is not a AsyncResult
> that the caller get but a real Future.
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2016-01-12 13:42 GMT+01:00 Leonardo K. Shikida <[email protected]>:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Is it possible to cancel a long-running @Asynchronous method?
> >
> > My idea was to cancel the Future object, but according to
> >
> > http://tomee.apache.org/examples-trunk/async-methods/README.html
> >
> > "Important to note that the AsyncResult object the JobProcessor returns
> is
> > not the same Future object the caller is holding. It would have been neat
> > if the real JobProcessor could just return String and the caller's
> version
> > of JobProcessor could return Future<String>, but we didn't see any way to
> > do that without adding more complexity. So the AsyncResult is a simple
> > wrapper object. The container will pull the String out, throw the
> > AsyncResult away, then put the String in the *real* Future that the
> caller
> > is holding."
> >
> > This thread also indicates that it's not defined in the EJB spec
> >
> >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16493381/cannot-cancel-asynchronous-call-to-ejb
> >
> > Any help is welcome.
> >
> > []
> >
> > Leo
> >
>

Reply via email to