Can you share your project or sthg to reproduce on github? Bval only got
some caching and no other change AFAIK.
Le 2 mars 2016 21:05, "Steve Goldsmith" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> It looks like it's in java.beans.ConstructorProperties since changing to
> @ConstructorProperties({"accountId", "customerGuid", "masIp", "maxAgeMs",
> "transId"}) causes the validation warnings. Did something change in that
> tier? M1 had no issues...
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > 2016-03-02 20:16 GMT+01:00 Steve Goldsmith <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > OK, this is two separate issues. This last one was because M2 expects
> > > @ConstructorProperties to include args from super class even though
> they
> > > are defined in super class ConstructorProperties and super is called.
> > >
> > >
> > Hmm, then how to construct these properties if there are not in the
> > constructor?
> >
> >
> > > The weird thing is that the validations failing should pass:
> > >
> > > c.b.s.m.ReaderLoggingInterceptor - Body:
> > >
> > >
> >
> {"accountId":"324234","hostName":"69.69.69.69","customerGuid":"5A234B53-8AFB-080C-8FCB-F027CFF1F696","transId":8558741418371468705,"maxAgeMs":5000}
> > >
> > >
> > If you updated @ConstructorProperties it can be linked. There was no
> > changed about that between M1 and M2 in bval.
> >
> >
> > > These are in the base class:
> > >
> > > o.a.c.j.v.ValidationExceptionMapper -
> > > MasService.getCustomerSTBData.arg0.maxAgeMs: may not be null
> > > o.a.c.j.v.ValidationExceptionMapper -
> > > MasService.getCustomerSTBData.arg0.customerGuid: size must be between
> 36
> > > and 36
> > >
> > > Something weird in bean validation in M2?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > try adding in system.properties: org.apache.openejb.cxf.bus.features
> =
> > > > org.apache.cxf.feature.LoggingFeature
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > > >
> > > > 2016-03-02 19:54 GMT+01:00 Steve Goldsmith <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > > This is on the output side of the fence, so it's probably the
> jackson
> > > > > client. With 2.7.2 I get:
> > > > >
> > > > > Argument #1 of constructor [constructor for
> > > > > com.bhn.services.masblaster.dto.CustStbDto, annotations: {interface
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.beans.ConstructorProperties=@java.beans.ConstructorProperties(value=[accountId])}]
> > > > > has no property name annotation; must have name when
> > multiple-parameter
> > > > > constructor annotated as Creator
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > what's the raw input JSON?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2016-03-02 19:17 GMT+01:00 sgjava <[email protected]>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is what I'm getting in M2 (works in M1):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can not deserialize instance of java.util.ArrayList out of
> > > > START_OBJECT
> > > > > > > token
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-7-0-0-M2-JAX-RS-List-issue-tp4677721p4677740.html
> > > > > > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Steven P. Goldsmith
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steven P. Goldsmith
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Steven P. Goldsmith
>

Reply via email to