Helllo. Ithink ActiveMQ is not JMS2.0 ready yet. Not sure if the plan is to go with ActiveMQ Artemis ?
BR Matej 2016-06-03 17:12 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > 2016-06-03 16:56 GMT+02:00 Steve Goldsmith <[email protected]>: > > > So, official == passes TCK? If it unofficially supports JMS 2.0 that > would > > work for me :) > > > > That's it > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > 2016-06-03 16:30 GMT+02:00 Steve Goldsmith <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > Yea, I really don't care about the legal debate, I was more looking > > for a > > > > time frame for full JMS 2.0 support. Is there somewhere that you have > > > > what's been completed in 7.0.0? That would be a place for me to > start. > > > > > > > > > > > mainly JMSContext support: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-core/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/activemq/JMS2AMQTest.java > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-core/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/activemq/JMS2AMQDefaultConnectionFactoryTest.java > > > > > > full official support would only happen with this legal issue solved > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This hasn't been discussed and don't want to do another legal > debate > > so > > > > to > > > > > be pragmatic if you need something we don't support let us know and > > > we'll > > > > > check and likely add it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-03 16:11 GMT+02:00 Steve Goldsmith <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > When do you anticipate full JMS 2.0 support? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mauro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Comes with ActiveMQ 5 and JMS 1.1 gull support and partly JMS > 2.0 > > > > > support > > > > > > > (has not been tested against TCK, mainly a wrapper on top of > JMS > > > > 1.1). > > > > > > > Le 3 juin 2016 07:08, "mauro2java2011" < > [email protected] > > > > > > a > > > > > > écrit > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi . > > > > > > > > I have read that the tomee7 is out. > > > > > > > > It came with jms 2 ActiveMQ ? > > > > > > > > Or it suppirt only jms 1 ? > > > > > > > > Mauro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Jms-2-into-tomee7-tp4678733.html > > > > > > > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Steven P. Goldsmith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Steven P. Goldsmith > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Steven P. Goldsmith > > >
