Thanks for the previous answers. Regarding meecrowave, I think it really
needs some extra basic info in the quickstart on how to get up and running
with Maven ASAP, because I just couldn't do it. As for TomEE 7.0.3, is
there any news? It seems the code from the repository is on the 7.0.4 cycle
already but there hasn't been a 7.0.3 release yet.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2017-02-24 8:50 GMT+01:00 Danilo Cominotti Marques <dcominot...@gmail.com
> >:
>
> Well this should move to openwebbeans@ list (meecrowave is a subproject of
> openwebbeans not tomee) ;)
>
> In my opinion, that's really exciting! I hadn't heard of Meecrowave before
> > this email. Congratulations for the efforts.
> >
> > Meecrowave OAuth2 sounds insanely helpful too -- and a lot simpler to
> > configure than JBoss KeyCloak, based on what I saw the last time I looked
> > at it.
> >
> > Should Meecrowave work out of the box with Bean Validation and Jackson
> > (with the JAX-RS extension) if they are included in the classpath?
> >
> >
> Not by default since it is not cdi code but it is not that hard:
>
> - for jackson you will ikely need to deactivate the default json provider
> (through the cli or setter if you code the main) setting
> jaxrs-default-provider to org.apache.johnzon.jaxrs.JsrProvider only
> probably and produce the jackson one, for instance:
>
> @Produces
> public JacksonJsonProvider jackson() {
> return new JacksonJsonProvider();
> }
>
>
> This is likely the hardest since jackson is not yet very jaxrs 2 friendly
> (its @Consumes/@Produces) so you need to switch off defaults providers
> which have a higher priority by default but it is not that hard.
>
> - for bean validation, once added to the classpath:
>
> @Produces
> public BeanValidationFeature bvalIntegration() {
> return new BeanValidationFeature();
> }
>
> That's it :).
>
>
>
> > Additionally, I didn't see any mention of DataSource configurations in
> the
> > documentation, but I suppose it should fine because of TomEE embedded, is
> > that right?
> >
> >
> Meecrowave is just cdi+jaxrs. It has a few extensions for jpa but it is
> *extensions*. Doc is on
> http://openwebbeans.apache.org/meecrowave/meecrowave-jpa/index.html. You
> love it or hate it cause it makes the resources part of the app (vs managed
> by the container for tomee case for instance). Both have pros and cons and
> I have to admit depending the app both make sense (no silver bullet ;)).
>
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Danilo Cominotti Marques
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > did a few on my blog
> > > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/#/search;query=meecrowave and
> there
> > > is
> > > the website openwebbeans.apache.org/meecrowave
> > >
> > > strictly speaking it is mainly inspired from recent tomee embedded
> > changes
> > > but simplifying it a lot and making the stack consistent/uniform (we
> > can't
> > > at tomee cause of all possibilities we have). It is limiting it to
> > > cdi+jaxrs (not even jpa). Opens a lot of doors nowaday even you can
> feel
> > > frustrated for JPA backends.
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > >
> > > 2017-02-23 22:25 GMT+01:00 hwaastad <he...@waastad.org>:
> > >
> > > > Meecrowave........
> > > >
> > > > Is that a new kid on the block? ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Seriously, seems cool, any blog articles yet?
> > > >
> > > > /hw
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.
> > > > n4.nabble.com/7-0-3-release-tp4681145p4681150.html
> > > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
