The filter solution requires to catch the request needing the change (based on the uri or a global flag), lookup the bean and set the value there.
Warp is a bit different and not sure it works well with embedded container. Goal is to proxy all requests to be able to execute remote code to validate code was executed. It is an awesome solution but you will probably need to migrate to remote container. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2017-04-25 9:10 GMT+02:00 hfe <a...@h41.de>: > Very good, I didn't know @Specializes, this works good. > But maybe you can give me a hint how I can do it with a filter? I was > looking at the code of Arquillian-Warp, I think there a filter is used so > that Warp is working? But I didn't get it, maybe I have to invest more time > in reading the Warp-Code. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440. > n4.nabble.com/JSF-Testing-with-embedded-TomEE-Manipulate-injected-object- > tp4681575p4681589.html > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
