2017-11-23 16:25 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois <francois.courta...@gemalto.com>: > Romain, > > My interceptor is linked to an annotation and is declared in the beans.xml > in order to work so I guess it is a cdi interceptor and, according to what > you have said, a new proxy is created and so the injection is not done on the > right proxy, right ? > But, in this case, is it a bug ?
Hmm, point is the jaxws runtime has no real other good way to do the interception. A workaround can be to have a jaws @vetoed pojo webservice and inject your cdi bean to delegate the processing to it. > > The other solution is to use @Interceptor or @Interceptors annotations but we > lose the beauty of using an annotation for interceptor, right ? Would do the same I think. > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com] > Sent: jeudi 23 novembre 2017 15:57 > To: users@tomee.apache.org > Subject: Re: Injecting WebserviceContext returns null > > annotation = cdi interceptor? if so it leads to a proxy and the injection > happens on the wrong instance I think > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn > > > 2017-11-23 15:50 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois > <francois.courta...@gemalto.com>: >> Hello Romain, >> >> I think I have found the issue. >> In fact, we used a custom annotation for a logging interceptor which targets >> METHOD and TYPE. >> >> If we remove this annotation on our WS endpoint (eg TYPE target) , then the >> injection is resolved. >> >> Do you know why we have this side effect ? Is it a bug ? >> I have a test case if you want. >> >> Best Regards. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com] >> Sent: jeudi 23 novembre 2017 14:25 >> To: users@tomee.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Injecting WebserviceContext returns null >> >> Looks close to >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/server/openejb-cxf/src/tes >> t/java/org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/PojoWebServiceContextTest.java >> , what can be the difference? >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn >> >> >> 2017-11-23 13:49 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois >> <francois.courta...@gemalto.com>: >>> Hello, >>> >>> No it's not an EJB webservice, just a POJO webservice annotated with >>> @WebService(name = "MyManager", targetNamespace = >>> "http://xxx.yyy.test..com/";, serviceName = "MyManager", wsdlLocation = >>> "wsdl/MyManager.wsdl") like in the sample of my first email. >>> It looks quite similar to the sample provided in the JAX-WS 2.3 >>> specification (maintenance release 5), page 82, §5.3 >>> (javax.xml.ws.WebServiceContext) except that the annotation, in our >>> development, uses attributes like name, ... >>> >>> Best Regards. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: jeudi 23 novembre 2017 13:34 >>> To: users@tomee.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Injecting WebserviceContext returns null >>> >>> Hi François, >>> >>> did you test with an EJB webservice? >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn >>> >>> >>> 2017-11-23 12:11 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois >>> <francois.courta...@gemalto.com>: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have the following : >>>> >>>> @WebService(name = "MyManager", targetNamespace = >>>> "http://xxx.yyy.test..com/";, serviceName = "MyManager", wsdlLocation >>>> = >>>> "wsdl/MyManager.wsdl") public class MyManagerService implements >>>> MyManager { >>>> >>>> @Resource >>>> WebServiceContext webServiceContext; .... >>>> } >>>> >>>> And the webServiceContet is always null ! Any clue ? >>>> >>>> Best Regards. >>>> ________________________________ >>>> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees >>>> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or >>>> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. >>>> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for >>>> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended >>>> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. >>>> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission >>>> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a >>>> transmitted virus. >>> ________________________________ >>> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees >>> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or >>> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. >>> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for >>> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended >>> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. >>> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission >>> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a >>> transmitted virus. >> ________________________________ >> This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and >> may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, >> either whole or partial, is prohibited. >> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for >> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended >> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. >> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission >> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a >> transmitted virus. > ________________________________ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and > may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, > either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free > from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus.
