yes, note that "name" doesn't need "java", the namespace is a "lookup" thing.
personally I would recommand you to stay away from default resources since you have no idea how it will behave at runtime and I would just ensure to name correctly each resource I use. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 16 juil. 2018 à 15:57, clemensx <[email protected]> a écrit : > Many thanks for the fast and detailed answer! > > Do I understand correctly that I can simply use the default name in the > resource.xml to extend the thread pool and should be able to use it > everywhere I used to access the default service with default settings? > @Resource(name="java:comp/DefaultManagedExecutorService" > > That would be perfectly fitting to our needs. > > Thanks! > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html >
