Thanks for the pointer! On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:25 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not related but yes, same as today (means some "portable" syntax of spring > needs to import these classes back > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/69ec437fbc07f72265aa315c3222e18f73409651#diff-7dc6e6ab14a91414c635ccfe889842eaL48 > ) > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mar. 7 août 2018 à 18:21, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > Not sure if my question is related to this thread, > > Is OpenJPA 3.0 will be supported by Spring5? > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:25 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Fabian! > > > > > > The main reason to not include OpenJPA-3.0.0 in TomEE-7.0.5 is because > > OpenJPA-3.0.0 requires Java8 as minimum level. > > > But TomEE-7.0.5 still supports to run on Java7. > > > > > > That said, it's pretty straight forward to just replace the OpenJPA jars > > on TomEE-7.0.5 with the ones from OpenJPA-3.0.0. > > > All the API jars should already have been upgraded in TomEE. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > Am 07.08.2018 um 13:51 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > Hi Fabian, > > > > > > > > no real reason I guess, feel free to open a PR > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > > < > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 7 août 2018 à 13:22, gilbertoca <gilbert...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > > > > > >> Hello, Fabian! > > > >> > > > >> Based on this answer[1] by Romain I think they are targeting the 2.2 > > spec > > > >> and waiting for the release of the Jakarta EE TCKs[2]. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> Gilberto > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > >> > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-TomEE-7-0-5-and-JPA-2-1-td4684185.html > > > >> [2] https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-jakarta-ee-tck > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> fabian-a.richter wrote > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> the OpenJPA team released its JPA 2.1 release at the same time as the > > > >>> update for 2.0 (2.4.3) > > > >>> > > > >>> As TomEE 7 is Java EE 7 based (which includes JPA 2.1 if I am not > > > >>> mistaken) why didn’t the 7.0.5 release finally incude the (correct) > > JPA > > > >>> 2.1 compliant relase of OpenJPA? > > > >>> > > > >>> You guys do maintain the OpenEJB packages as well, don’t you? > > > >>> > > > >>> What was the reason for still packaging a JPA 2.0 implementation > > into a > > > >>> JPA 2.1 application server? > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks and best, > > > >>> > > > >>> Fabian > > > >>> smime.p7s (7K) > > > >>> < > > > >> > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4684429/0/smime.p7s> > > > >> ; > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Sent from: > > > >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > >
-- WBR Maxim aka solomax
