Unless it can be demonstrated that it actually causes an issue we should > leave it as is and focus on other priorities. Pinging ActiveMQ about it > would not hurt but I suspect its not a priority for them either.
+1 El mié., 19 jun. 2019 a las 6:51, Richard Monson-Haefel (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Unless it can be demonstrated that it actually causes an issue we should > leave it as is and focus on other priorities. Pinging ActiveMQ about it > would not hurt but I suspect its not a priority for them either. > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:45 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > It can certainly be requested. It would be up to the ActiveMQ project to > > decide if they wanted to make that change. I'd certainly be happy to see > > what's involved and have a go and send a PR, but if it involves > significant > > effort, I personally would prefer to work on EE8 as a higher priority. > > > > Ultimately though, the priorities for the TomEE project ultimately come > > down to what the community would like, so feedback is very welcome. > Anyone > > else have any views? > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 11:33 AM Alex The Rocker <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I agree with dkwakkel, Apache Johnzon should be enought for all TomEE > > > runtime requirements.Mixing two different JSON processors in same > > > classpath can lead to a dependency mess. > > > > > > After all, ActiveMQ is an Apache project, and even if when it was > > > developed Apache Johnzon wasn't available, it would make great sense > > > to replace FasterXML Jackson (which isn't an Apache project, even if > > > it has Apache License 2.0) by Apache Johnzon. > > > > > > How about a JIRA request on ActiveMQ for this "small" change ? :) > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Alex > > > > > > Le mer. 19 juin 2019 à 12:22, Jonathan Gallimore > > > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > > > > I think ActiveMQ pulls jackson in, as it uses Jackson internally. I > > don't > > > > know that we could avoid that without forking and making some > > > (potentially > > > > big) changes. > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:36 AM dkwakkel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I see both jackson and johnzon are now part of TomEE 8 M2: > > > > > jackson-annotations-2.9.0.jar > > > > > jackson-core-2.9.4.jar > > > > > jackson-databind-2.9.4.jar > > > > > jackson-dataformat-yaml-2.9.4.jar > > > > > johnzon-core-1.1.11.jar > > > > > johnzon-jaxrs-1.1.11.jar > > > > > johnzon-jsonb-1.1.11.jar > > > > > johnzon-mapper-1.1.11.jar > > > > > > > > > > Should not only johnzon be enough? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sent from: > > > > > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Richard Monson-Haefel > https://twitter.com/rmonson > https://www.tomitribe.com/ > -- Atentamente: César Hernández.
