Thanks Jon

Worked a charm.

Paul


On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:17 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks like the update to EclipseLink 2.7.4 I committed this morning fixes
> it. Could you try swapping out the EclipseLink jar in your Plume
> distribution lib directory for 2.7.4 and let us know how you get on?
>
>
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/persistence/eclipselink/2.7.4/eclipselink-2.7.4.jar
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:57 PM Paul Carter-Brown
> <paul.carter-br...@jini.guru> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > Seems like it's related to using PLUME (Eclipselink) where a
> > persistence.xml is present.
> >
> > Logs are as attached along with a simple war that fails. If I comment out
> > the contents of my persistence.xml file then it boots fine (but
> > EntityManagers are all null).
> >
> > If I include persistence.xml and even comment out my EntityManager
> > injection points then it fails.
> >
> > Should if you need more info.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:29 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The short answer is yes - TomEE 8.0.0 should work fine on Java 11. We
> >> definitely want to know about your issue and dig into it.
> >>
> >> Can you provide your boot output? I did just double check with a vanilla
> >> TomEE 8.0.0 Plus and OpenJDK 11 from AdoptOpenJDK on my Mac here - its
> >> booted fine. Output is here:
> >> https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/27997af50014229b702cf8b5710563ec
> >>
> >> I have actually successfully booted TomEE 8 on a self-built JDK 13 as
> >> well.
> >> I wouldn't expect it to work with apps whose classes are compiled with
> >> Java
> >> 13 as a target as I suspect that will need an ASM update, but it did
> boot
> >> and run an application.
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 9:44 PM Paul Carter-Brown
> >> <paul.carter-br...@jini.guru> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Does tomEE 8.0.0 support OpenJDK 11? I've tried and get errors upon
> >> boot.
> >> > Will elaborate if it is supposed to support java 11.
> >> >
> >> > Paul
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to