Thanks, David. Hope to get update of the Arquiillian adapters soon. *Hantsy Bai*
Self-employed consultant, fullstack developer, agile coach GitHub: https://github.com/hantsy Twitter: https://twitter.com/@hantsy Medium: https://medium.com/@hantsy On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:51 AM David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hantsy! > > First, thank you for reaching out and thinking of TomEE, that's > wonderful. I know you're working with many app server teams to get this > goal accomplished. > > We're achieving our Jakarta EE 9 support through bytecode transformation > of the zips themselves. We have not yet expanded that to the Arquillian > Adapters. We definitely should do that, but I'm not sure when that will > happen. [note to the general community, if you want to work on that, just > pop on the dev@ list and say so and we'll fill you up with pointers and > support] > > On Remote vs Managed, our Remote adapter does both based on the > configuration. I think it might be worth it to explicitly split that > adapter in two and name each appropriately just to avoid confusion, but the > functionality for each should be there. > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Dec 5, 2020, at 11:02 PM, hantsy bai <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I created a starter boilerplate project for Jakarta EE 9 applications, > > https://github.com/hantsy/jakartaee9-starter-boilerplate > > > > But currently I can not find a Arquillian integration for the Apache > TomEE. > > > > http://tomee.apache.org/arquillian-available-adapters.html > > > > BTW, for the existing adapters, I have a question there the **Remote** > > adapter worked on a local managed Tomee, it is the **manged** in my mind. > > For my experience, the remote adapters to try to test against the running > > servers. > > > > > > Regards > > Hantsy > >
