THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients

Hello,

Thanks a lot for your effort on this project 😊
Can't wait for TomEE 10.3.0 delivery ...

Best Regards.

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Jung via users <[email protected]>
Sent: mardi 3 novembre 2026 20:27
To: [email protected]
Cc: Markus Jung <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TomEE and CVE-2026-65637

I hope to be able to run a release as soon as tomorrow for both 11.0.0-M2 and 
10.3.0 if everything works now. Sorry for the long time without a releases, we 
had quite a lot of blockers we needed clear first. We’re all operating on very 
limited time budgets afterall.


Thanks

Markus

> On 3. Nov 2026, at 18:59, Richard Zowalla via users <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
> No worries, I expect a release soon. AFAIR we are in the last stabilizing 
> work since we updated a bunch of dependencies and fixed a lot of stuff.
> I would even say, that you need a fixed seat for what is coming ;-)
>
> Regarding release: We have instructions here
> https://tomee.apache.org/dev/release-tomee.html
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>> Am 03.11.2026 um 18:55 schrieb Jonathan S. Fisher <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Man for the life of me I can't remember how to run the release. I
>> probably need a senior committer to walk me through it again.
>> Francois in the mean time you could update and run the build locally
>> without tests and try it against your own application!
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2026 at 1:35 AM COURTAULT Francois via users <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> THALES GROUP LIMITED DISTRIBUTION to email recipients
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> This CVE affected TomEE 10.2.0 (latest available version). It is
>>> brought by tomcat-coyote component in Tomcat 10.1.57.
>>> The CVE is fixed in Tomcat 10.1.59.
>>> BTW latest Tomcat version is 10.1.61 .
>>>
>>> Do you plan to release a new TomEE 10.x version with updated
>>> components soon ?
>>>
>>> Best Regards.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan | [email protected]
>> Pessimists, see a jar as half empty. Optimists, in contrast, see it
>> as half full.
>> Engineers, of course, understand the glass is twice as big as it
>> needs to be.
>


Reply via email to