On Tue, October 18, 2011 09:24, [email protected] wrote: > å¨ 2011-10-18äºç 08:43 +0200ï¼Henry C.åéï¼ >> On Tue, October 18, 2011 04:46, [email protected] wrote: >> Only once the down node >> was brought back up did things become snappy again. > there should be no issue when one cluster member down, it will discover the > change and rehash the contents to the left nodes in cluster. the timeout or > heatbeat checking will be <10s. after that, it will be stable as before.
Thanks, you were right - this had to do with the linux virtual server and it's persistence setting on the directors.
