http://people.apache.org/~zym/benchmark/20111116-cn62.txt

this is the status of reverse proxy working in my production env, normal
time.

FYI


在 2011-11-16三的 09:56 +0700,Hung Nguyen写道:
> We're using ATS in production too. In our environment, we use ATS as
> reverse proxy, serving thousands of connection for social games and
> website, behind IP virtual server. Till now, I dont have anything to
> complaint about ATS but, look at result of our benchmarking and
> service monitoring, ATS is as good as SQUID and Varnish currently do,
> I meant 3 are good and I dont see TS is better. 
> We dont use clustering function, because it's (maybe) broken or
> untested, undocumented, and maybe not stable, we cannot bring it to
> production environment. 
> I attach to this email screenshot of IP virtual server, it shows
> number of connection ATS is serving for our social game. Hope it's
> worth to let you give ATS a try.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Mav Peri <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>         We are using ATS in production and we have seen it serving up
>         to around up to 5k requests per second on dynamic content.
>          This was in a cluster of EC2 instances and not a single
>         physical server with several objects being in the kb.
>         
>         
>         It works well but if the origin server becomes congested ATS
>         is missing functionality to serve stale if congested. I have
>         observed that this results in ATS being unable to catch up
>         under heavy load even if the origin server is not congested.
>         Eventually it does catch up but the behaviour is far from
>         desirable.
>         
>         
>         Another big limitation at present is that the ICP
>         functionality is broken and there is no proper documentation
>         on implementing parent http (if that would be suitable) so you
>         will have to rely on trial and error and any help the guys on
>         this mailing can provide. The lack of ICP is not to be
>         underestimated. It is a waste of resources which increases
>         load on your origin servers.
>         
>         
>         From: Ron Tsoref <[email protected]>
>         Reply-To: <[email protected]>
>         Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:44:03 +0200
>         To: <[email protected]>
>         Subject: Real-world numbers
>         
>         
>         
>         Has anybody released numbers of ATS performance in real-world
>         scenario? I mean, performance of ATS serving images,
>         CSS/JavaScript files, etc. (I don't mean 100 bytes objects
>         servering performance, as this the only thing I found.)
>         
>         
>         Anything related to the subject is more than welcome!
>         
>         
>         Ron
>         
>         
>         ______________________________________________________________________
>         This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security
>         System.
>         For more information please visit
>         http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
>         ______________________________________________________________________
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> hungnv
> 

-- 
zym, Zhao Yongming.
aka: yonghao @ taobao.com

Reply via email to