The expires header looks suspect in the sample response. I would try setting it to something sensible.
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Tom Melendez wrote: > Hey Folks, > > Brought up a new ATS server, configured as a reverse proxy, and I'm seeing > that none of my requests are being cached. Think you can help me walk > through what's up? I suspect it's something trivial. > > Here's what I have set: > > # records.config > CONFIG proxy.config.http.uncacheable_requests_bypass_parent INT 1 > CONFIG proxy.config.http.down_server.cache_time INT 600 > # cache control # > CONFIG proxy.config.http.cache.http INT 1 > CONFIG proxy.config.http.cache.ignore_server_no_cache INT 1 > CONFIG proxy.config.http.cache.ignore_client_cc_max_age INT 1 > CONFIG proxy.config.http.cache.cache_responses_to_cookies INT 1 > CONFIG proxy.config.http.cache.ignore_authentication INT 0 > CONFIG proxy.config.http.cache.cache_urls_that_look_dynamic INT 1 > CONFIG proxy.config.http.cache.enable_default_vary_headers INT 0 > > > # storage.config > var/trafficserver 1024M > > # cache.config > (all commented out) > > # remap.config > map http://my_domain http://an.ip.address.here > > ### > # typical header returned from server > ### > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:15:17 GMT > Server: ATS/3.2.4 > X-Drupal-Cache: HIT > Etag: "1371338010-0" > X-Generator: Drupal 7 (http://drupal.org) > Cache-Control: public, max-age=0 > Last-Modified: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:13:30 +0000 > Expires: Sun, 19 Nov 1978 05:00:00 GMT > Vary: Cookie,Accept-Encoding > Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 > Age: 0 > Connection: keep-alive > > > # cache size > sudo /usr/local/bin/traffic_line -r proxy.process.cache.bytes_total > 1005346816 > > > Making the requests with curl and Chrome. It's not that I don't get all of > the pages/assets, it's just that NONE of them ever hit the cache. Server is > on RHEL, on AWS (m1.large) running ATS 3.2.4 that I built with the default > options. > > I have the extended, common, extended2 and squid logs enabled, so I should be > able to see most everything, right? > > Thanks, > > Tom
