Am 10.08.2013 19:47, schrieb Reindl Harald: > i am currently working at my F18 SPEC-file to reflect the latest > changes in my packaging and rebuild 3.2.5 ASAP on Fedora > 19 so that "yum update" and "yum downgrade" gives a better picture > > but i doubt that the 3 years old XEON at the company will > outperform the one year old IvyBdrige at home with the > same environment, benchmarks besides ATS are compareable > > we will see
Am 10.08.2013 19:37, schrieb Leif Hedstrom: > Yeah I've tested it with my normal perf regressions, and 3.3.5 was > the same as 3.2.4. In my small object test I get 160,000 qps on what hardware straight from hell do you get 160 thousand qps? however, back to topic...... ____________________________________________________________________________ OK, sorry for the noise, that's why there was a "?" in the subject same virtual machine with trafficserver-3.2.5-3.fc19.20130810.rh.x86_64 Total transferred: 94732065 bytes HTML transferred: 64253704 bytes Requests per second: 3206.60 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 62.371 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 0.312 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 2966.48 [Kbytes/sec] received ____________________________________________________________________________ so there is a regression with Fedora 19 GCC or the older Xeon outperforms the Core i7 for whatever reason in context ATS GCC regression is unlikely and F19 with -fstack-protector-strong should outperform the F18 -fstack-protector-all builds Fedora 19: gcc-4.8.1-1.fc19.x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz 3.3.5: Requests per second: 3178.58 [#/sec] (mean) 3.2.5: Requests per second: 3206.60 [#/sec] (mean) Fedora 18: gcc-4.7.2-8.fc18.x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 @2.67GHz 3.2.5: Requests per second: 9002.97 [#/sec] (mean) ____________________________________________________________________________ very interesting, normally the XEON outperforms my workstation only in cases where the 2x4 cores are really used and in any other load tests the 3.40GHz is a least fatser than 2.67GHz yes, Vmware Workstation is slower then ESXi 5.0 but usually not *3 times* - sorry again for the noise!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
