Sorry, that looks confusing. Leif and all, I was referring to this in that last e-mail:
Leif wrote: "One thought: Are you by chance running with the reclaimable freelist feature enabled ? If so, it sounds like it could possible consume a metric ton of mmap areas. Can you check your build and the number of map areas that your traffic_process is consuming ?" On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Adam W. Dace <[email protected]>wrote: > I've left that feature alone, as I don't fully understand it. My first > goal was to take a stock ATS installation, and simply convince it > to act as a speedy forward-only caching proxy with as few changes as > possible. I've then taken that config, added child/parent options and am > currently running it on a hosted VM(parent) and my Mac(child). I haven't > documented that part at all, as it seems the current documentation > addresses all of that quite well. > > I'll try to learn more about CentOS over time and see if I can report back > on the number of map areas it's using. > I've no idea if there's really utilities for that in Mac OS X. > Frustrating. > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:02 PM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:11 PM, James Peach <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Nov 21, 2013, at 7:57 PM, Adam W. Dace <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Also, once you've gotten past your immediate problem and are looking >> to deploy my Wiki page may help: >> >>> >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/WebProxyCacheTuning >> >>> >> >>> To call it "best practices" would be a bit much, but I spent quite a >> bit of time simply tuning ATS for my own uses. >> >>> The page is finally stable(i.e. I'm done now) and I'm quite pleased. >> I'm hoping once the next release is out the door >> >>> I can start bugging the commiters to take a look and review it. >> >> >> >> Yes, that's a nice piece of work! The effect >> ofproxy.config.system.mmap_max is interesting; were you ble to test with >> tcmalloc? >> >> >> One thought: Are you by chance running with the reclaimable freelist >> feature enabled ? If so, it sounds like it could possible consume a metric >> ton of mmap areas. Can you check your build and the number of map areas >> that your traffic_process is consuming ? >> >> — leif >> >> > > > -- > ____________________________________________________________ > Adam W. Dace <[email protected]> > > Phone: (815) 355-5848 > Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451 > Microsoft Messenger - [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about > -- ____________________________________________________________ Adam W. Dace <[email protected]> Phone: (815) 355-5848 Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451 Microsoft Messenger - [email protected] <[email protected]> Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about
